(Getty)
Prince Harry has been cautioned about the potential futility of his ongoing legal battle against the British press, particularly The Sun, over privacy issues. Royal commentator Ingrid Seward shared her thoughts during a recent interview with GB News, expressing concerns about the case’s progression and its financial implications for Harry.
Seward pointed out Harry’s determination, explaining, “Harry has got the bit between his teeth because he just goes for it and he doesn’t let go. He is absolutely going for this court case where he feels his privacy has been disturbed.” She emphasized that Harry is pursuing the lawsuit with vigor, especially after alleging that he was hacked and that his former girlfriend Chelsy Davy had bugs planted on her car.
While he has reportedly dropped the issue regarding Davy, Harry remains focused on challenging The Sun for unlawful news gathering. However, Seward believes that Harry’s legal pursuit may be more of a financial drain than a worthwhile endeavor. She commented, “The judge has got really fed up in this case because The Sun has a strong argument, Harry’s lawyers have a strong argument, and they’re just tussling together.”
This ongoing back-and-forth has created frustration for both the legal teams and the courts. According to Seward, the judges overseeing the case have grown weary of the stalemate between the two sides. She noted, “The judges have said, ‘Look, this is like two huge forces fighting each other. No one is getting anywhere.’” It appears that the battle is consuming substantial time and resources without reaching a resolution.
As the case drags on, the court has set a firm timeline for its conclusion. Seward explained, “The court case has to happen in January. You’ve all got to come, and it’s got to be settled. Enough is enough.” This declaration signals a desire from the judiciary to bring the drawn-out proceedings to a close, with a trial date now set.
Even Mr. Justice Fancourt, presiding over the case, has voiced concerns about the excessive use of court resources. According to reports from the same outlet, Fancourt stated, “I have previously indicated to the parties that this individual claim, although it raises important issues, is starting to absorb more than an appropriate share of the court’s resources, contrary to the requirement in the overriding objective to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost.”
Ingrid Seward’s commentary reflects growing doubts about the sustainability and outcome of Harry’s legal pursuit. As the court prepares for the January trial, the battle between Prince Harry and The Sun continues to be a high-stakes legal confrontation. However, questions remain about whether the fight will ultimately be worth the significant financial and emotional investment.
