Luke Hales/Getty Images
On the November 21 episode of The Daily Blast podcast, host Greg Sargent discussed Donald Trump’s controversial announcement that he would use the military to carry out mass deportations, citing his plans to declare a national emergency to facilitate this move. This came after Trump confirmed in a tweet at 4 a.m. that he would deploy military forces for this purpose, raising alarms across the political spectrum.
The response from Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) was swift and harsh. In an interview with Newsmax, Paul described Trump’s idea as a “huge mistake,” emphasizing that using the military to carry out domestic policies would send “a terrible image” to the world. Paul, who has long advocated for limited government, expressed concerns about the military being used for such operations, saying, “I will not support an emergency to put the army into our cities. I think it’s a terrible image for us as citizens.”
He further pointed out that many immigrants, like a long-time housekeeper, would not deserve such treatment. Paul’s remarks have become a rare voice of opposition within the GOP, a party largely silent on Trump’s radical proposals.
Tom Nichols, a critic of the MAGA movement, joined the discussion, noting that Paul’s stance, although unusual, aligns with a traditional conservative view against overreach by the executive. Nichols remarked, “Rand Paul is actually defending this conservative Republican tradition,” as his opposition to the plan reflects concerns over the militarization of domestic policies—a principle that Republicans once held dear.
Nichols pointed out that, aside from Paul, many Republican leaders have been reluctant to speak out against Trump’s proposed actions. The conversation then turned to the broader implications for the U.S. military. Nichols, who has deep experience teaching military officers, explained that the armed forces typically resist being used for domestic purposes, as their professional ethos is focused on defending against foreign threats.
He warned that if Trump were to push this agenda, it could strain military loyalty, as soldiers may be forced to choose between loyalty to Trump and their constitutional duties. “The military hates domestic missions,” Nichols said, adding that the idea of deploying troops within U.S. cities could create significant tension within the armed forces.
Further complicating the matter is the potential role of Trump’s inner circle in pushing forward such plans. Nichols raised concerns that individuals like Pete Hegseth, a controversial figure from CNN, could be appointed to key positions in the Department of Defense, allowing Trump to bypass resistance within the military establishment. Nichols suggested that such appointments could lead to the militarization of domestic policies, potentially overriding constitutional safeguards.
While the idea of using the military for mass deportations seems unlikely to materialize without significant political and logistical hurdles, Nichols emphasized the importance of maintaining a level-headed response. “One thing at a time,” he advised, warning against being overwhelmed by the rhetoric and the chaos that surrounds Trump’s proposals.
As the GOP remains divided on this issue, Nichols expressed concern that many Republican lawmakers would ultimately fail to stand up for constitutional principles, choosing political survival over patriotism. “Many of them will fail that test,” he said. The ongoing tension within the GOP could have lasting implications for the future of American democracy, with the party’s commitment to traditional conservative values facing increasing challenges from the MAGA movement.
